You are not logged in. Would you like to login?
Offline
Thought it might be a good idea to start a thread for any other IRS conversions youve seen whilst browsing the web or car shows etc, or anywhere else in your travels..
I found this one interesting, first time ive seen the later jag IRS utilised
they dont look to bad really
Last edited by Daze (10/29/2011 9:04 pm)
Offline
Does that sway bar work?
Offline
Its hard to beleve it would do much being so close to the control arms inner pivots
Last edited by KLR250 (5/12/2011 12:41 pm)
Offline
KLR250 wrote:
Its hard to beleve it would do much being so close to the control arms inner pivots
it is kind of counterintuitive. yes by moving it in toward the pivot it will have less effect on the suspension, BUT the sway bar arms are shorter so they will be much stiffer, and I imagine it will be similar to bigger ones as the two facts will counter balance each other.
as to some pix I have tones of them and will post some when I have a little more time.
Offline
I understand shorter equals stiffer. But it loses leverage and motion. So it would seem to me it better be way stiffer.
Offline
Ralphy wrote:
I understand shorter equals stiffer. But it loses leverage and motion. So it would seem to me it better be way stiffer.
Think of a sway bar as a torsion bar (basically what it is):
1. The shorter it is the stiffer it is.
2. The fatter it is the stiffer it is.
3. The shorter the arm between the "torsion" section and the end link the stiffer it is.
On the flip side as you pointed out the further out on the LCA the bar mounts the less leverage the LCA will have on the sway bar and the more leverage the sway bar will have on the LCA. As the mount moves in closer to the pivot the leverage the say bar has on the LCA is reduced and the leverage the LCA has on the sway bar is increased.
in this particular set up the mount is about 2/3 of the way between the inner pivot and the shock mount but the arm between the "torsion" section and the end link is about 1/3 the length of a typical sway bar.
All that said I would guess that the force applied to the LCA by the sway bar would be comparable to a full size sway bar of about 1/2" diameter and when you think about the Jag being luxury first and performance second that makes sense especially since many of these rear ends don't have a sway bar of any kind.
well thats enough rambling from me feel free to tell me I have no Idea what I am talking about because that is always a possibility.
Offline
Heres an IRS unit a mate is thinking of fitting to his falcon, Looks quite nice, Track is 57.30". Its from a MX81 Toyota Cressida
benefits
its already a ford stud pattern
Its double A arm
Diffs are pretty tough
apparently easy to upgrade rear brakes
do you guys have these cars over in the US?
Offline
For a good idea of whats out there I like this article Hot rod put together.
The first half of the article is all about the IRS unit Ford designed for the classic Mustang back in the 60s. Back then this unit used a Jag diff but the guy recreating them now is using a ford 8.8
classic Mustang IRS
The DVS kit has been on the market for a wile and allows the user to install a modern cobra Mustang IRS in to a classic Mustang. the biggest down fall to this is that you cant really narrow it up.... well at least not with out major changes.
DVS Mustang IRS
Once you get past all the tubing I believe this unit is basically a Jag nock off
BLUE MOON CONTROL FREAK SUSPENSION
the next three are basically all chromed Jag units. thay have been upgraded to use different center sections and seam to have some adjustability.
HEIDTS HOT ROD SHOP
SCOTTS HOT RODS
KUGEL KOMPONENTS
I find this last one most interesting. I think I like it because it is so different than everything else.
TEAM321
Offline
Daze maybe you could add these pics Pier otherwise known as Stroker 427 lives in Italy. He created his 6 link, which is actually a 5 link C3 Corvette conversion. Major design changes making his own hub carrier, link mounts two piece halfshafts. No longer using the halfshaft as a suspension member. Forward links are adjustable for anti squat and the toe link behind the IRS is adjustable at the bearing carrier. He has the unit designed to change the amount of toe with regard to suspension travel. Similar to a C4 design but even better. This has got to be one of the most extensive and quality upgrades I have seen for a home builder. He has the CAD downloads on the site. You can copy the files load them into a water jet and it will cut to size. Some guys are copying it in stainless. He was interviewed in a magazine.
Pics:
Here is the guy building a stainless version:
The article:
Last edited by Ralphy (5/16/2011 10:05 am)
Offline
Wow Ralphy, that looks like quite a build
Offline
The shocks he has are Penske 3" travel. A bit pricy but Pier says are well worth it.
Offline
Daze some here have also not seen what Mickmate (Nick) has done with a Jag IRS. Nick gets four stars also! LOL
Here is the watts conversion on a factory hub. Scroll down to the pic.
More pics!
Last edited by Ralphy (5/19/2011 6:33 am)
Offline
Then there is cobraracing.com.
Offline
here is a few more I found in another online article
Offline
Daze,
The pictures you posted pretty much answers the question where single coil overs go, behind the axles.
Offline
wow, theres some nice IRS setups here, lots of bling thats for sure
Offline
Offline
Day here's a T5 I saw.
Offline
Ralphy wrote:
Day here's a T5 I saw.
Did you take that picture your self or find it on-line some where???
Offline
I had found it on line. I think it's the same car in the video I had found. It comes up in some obscure search. If you search, Mustang, T5, IRS, etc... It will not come up. I found it in some picks I have saved.
Offline
It's funny that there are not much applications with the Corvette differential cover bracket involved. Just from eyeballing, it looks like a simple adaptable rear bracket for the Jaguar IRS. These are very rare or not existent overhere otherwise I would definitely use one on my car.
Mustsed
Offline
are you talking about this piece minus the differential?
if so you would have to go to outboard discs but other than that I think you are right it should be an easy swap
Offline
The Batwing? Dana 36 or Dana 44. The 44 is beefier than the 36. It's also a bit more.
Offline
Yep, that's what I am talking about. Shouldn't be to hard adapting this to any framed car chassis or am I missing something?
Ralphy, I live in Turkey and parts importing that big is a real problem!!!!!
Mustsed
Offline
Mustsed wrote:
Yep, that's what I am talking about. Shouldn't be to hard adapting this to any framed car chassis or am I missing something?
No, not really. C3/C4 'Vette conversions are not unknown in the Camaro/Nova world, probably find a few examples on the Camaro boards and at pro-touring.com.
Conceptually the C3 IRS is basically a semi-trailing arm, unlike the Jag the lower lateral link provides minimal fore-aft location. The C4 design is a refinement of this.
Offline
KLR250 wrote:
Heres an IRS unit a mate is thinking of fitting to his falcon, Looks quite nice, Track is 57.30". Its from a MX81 Toyota Cressida
The US got the MX83 at the end of the Cressida run here, I don't know how similar the rear suspensions are.
Never got the MX81 so far as I know.
Offline
Musteed,
It's funny you brought up using the bat wing. I post at another board and this board may be of great help to you. VetteMod.com happens to be run by a guy in the Netherlands, his ID is Twin Turbo. Another guy is in Saudi Arabia, I think he goes by Saudivette. Then there is Stroker 427, he is in Italia. He did a conversion on a C3. Thsse guys are pretty darn good with Corvettes and I'm sure they know how to get parts around your area. Also you may find someone in Turkey.
Anyhow someone had recently posted about using the bat wing on a C3, here's the link. Also if you join VetteMod do introduce yourself, they like that.
Hers is the bat wing link.
Ralphy
Last edited by Ralphy (10/23/2011 11:36 am)
Offline
here is a few more pix I found moving posts from the old forum
Offline
Daze wrote:
here is a few more pix I found moving posts from the old forum
The stock Jag IRS uses the trailing arms to induce roll understeer by pulling the outside wheel forward, and since the lower arms are (unlike so many later designs) rigidly pivoted to the diff housing via roller bearings this ends up pulling the entire cradle forward at the outside wheel.
Street-rod types rigid-mount the diff but ditch the trailing arms. Racers run trailing arms with inner pivots coaxial to the LCA inner pivot axis to get rid of the induced roll steer.
This guy appears to have a rigidly-mounted diff case but retains the stock trailing arm orientation.
I wonder how well it held up once the car went together. It seems to me he'd have either broken parts or ferocious roll-bind.
Last edited by JEM (10/23/2011 10:02 pm)
Offline
JEM wrote:
The stock Jag IRS uses the trailing arms to induce roll understeer by pulling the outside wheel forward, and since the lower arms are (unlike so many later designs) rigidly pivoted to the diff housing via roller bearings this ends up pulling the entire cradle forward at the outside wheel.
Street-rod types rigid-mount the diff but ditch the trailing arms. Racers run trailing arms with inner pivots coaxial to the LCA inner pivot axis to get rid of the induced roll steer.
This guy appears to have a rigidly-mounted diff case but retains the stock trailing arm orientation.
I wonder how well it held up once the car went together. It seems to me he'd have either broken parts or ferocious roll-bind.
I agree. you would think that would cause all kinds of binding. thing is I have seen a lot of people set there Jag IRS units up that way. Especially hot rod guys. The front leaf spring mount seams like the perfect place to mount the trailing arm so they do with no regard to the different arcs the arms travel at in relation to the wish bones. When you ask them they usually answer and say there is no bind. the only thing I can figure is that the bushings are soft enough and the difference in arcs in minimal enough that the bushings can absorb the difference. If you ever look at a stock Jag trailing arm the bushing is a flat rubber piece almost 4" across. that much rubber would absorb so much flex that I wonder how much, if any, understeer was actually induced in to the suspension??
I went with the "Racers run trailing arms with inner pivots coaxial to the LCA inner pivot axis to get rid of the induced roll steer. " method because I didn't want to run big bushings. In this picture you can see my inner pivots on my pinion support, but at the point the picture was taken I had not yet fabbed up the arms
The best solution to Jag trailing arms is the one that Mustsed talked about wanting to do and then Ralphy brought us pictures of from the Cobra forum. Watts link